What do you think about their findings? I'm very curious.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
One
Two
Three
Four
Five
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(260)
-
▼
December
(23)
- Only a Day Away
- A Year In Review
- Handymen
- Happy Happy Birthday Grandma Dear
- Operation Lighter Than Air
- 'Twas the Night Before Christmas
- Miles To Go...
- How To Make a Snow Angel
- Snow Day
- Babies
- The Sound of Music
- The Long and Winding Road
- Santa's Digital Workshop
- It's Funny Because It's True
- Generations
- Phenomenal Cosmic Powers
- Let Your Light So Shine
- A Man of Many Hats
- Say Cheese
- The First White Dress
- Civilization
- Mirror, Mirror On the Wall
- Sharing Time
-
▼
December
(23)
8 comments:
Until the study is duplicated, it's just someone's opinion. Even if true, the word "tends" covers the exceptions, present company included.
haha well since i have two girls should i feel flattered?
but in all reality seems like a weird study that is hard to control and remove outliers
Well, at least we each have *one* girl, right?? Better than none! ;-)
That said, my drop-dead-gorgeous neighbor is the mom to three boys and no girls. Just goes to show you can do a study to "prove" just about anything. ;-)
Since I have 2 boys and 1 girl also, I think we fall into the same attractiveness category. And, since my husband thinks I'm gorgeous that must mean you are gorgeous too, according to the theory. :D
That is the strangest thing I've ever heard! Man I really hope I have a girl next so that I'm not in the homely category:)
Personally, it completely depends on your definition of "beautiful" people. I don't think Tom Cruise is "beautiful," maybe I'm just bitter because I only have a boy. :)
If those with beauty have girls, it must be that those with boys have brains right?
Hm, well that explains things over here at least!
Post a Comment